Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
If necessary, the court can require the responsible party to provide additional funding or, conversely, the responsible party is reimbursed any excess funds not used for remediation. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 8:16 am
If necessary, the court can require the responsible party to provide additional funding or, conversely, the responsible party is reimbursed any excess funds not used for remediation. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
In the Porsche case, the lower court had dismissed a securities lawsuit brought by numerous hedge funds that entered various swap transactions in the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 12:05 pm
Furthermore, the vast majority of the funds in question are in an independently managed trust, and neither Mr. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 11:41 am
And the trial court earlier found—after a trial—that “TFC’s vestry … for more than 150 years has governed the property in question, raised funds to upgrade the property, repaired the property, financed additions to the property and decided how the property was to be used. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:41 pm
ASB Allegiance Real Estate Fund v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:21 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals said allegations of systemic delays and neglect in mental health care for veterans is something Congress, not the courts, needs to address.In a 10-1 decision, the appellate court reversed a prior 2-1 ruling by a 9th Circuit panel.Reproductive Rights/Legislation: ARIZONA BANS FUNDING FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD, OTHER ABORTION PROVIDERS, 20 No. 1 Westlaw Journal Health Law 8, Westlaw Journal Health Law May 24, 2012 Arizona Gov. [read post]
25 May 2012, 3:13 pm
Stamer available including: Review & Updated Health Plan Mental Health Coverage As DOL Supplements Guidance On Health Plan Mental Health Parity Rules Western Mixers & Officers Ordered To Pay $1.2M+ For Improperly Using Benefit Plan Funds For Company Operations, Other ERISA Violations Plan Administrator Faces Civil & Criminal Prosecution For Allegedly Making Prohibited $3.2 Million Real Estate Investment Employee Plan Fee Disclosure… [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:59 am
“The assessment shall address the premarket review process of drugs by [FDA], using an assessment framework that draws from appropriate quality system standards, including management responsibility, documents controls and records management, and corrective and preventive action. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:34 am
Amends the Communications Act of 1934. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm
The court also has appointed an independent fiduciary to terminate the plan and to collect, marshal, pay out and administer plan assets. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:37 pm
District Court for the District of Idaho against Matthew D. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm
The amendment was demanded by Germany before a recent challenge to the temporary EFSF mechanism in its Constitutional Court. [read post]
20 May 2012, 10:17 pm
Whenever EPA publishes this final rule, amending an extant rule, expect litigation and another corner, another hallway in the labyrinth. [read post]
20 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The lawsuit raises state law claims of breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract, alleging that the Fund was obligated to purchase U.S. bonds, and asserting federal court jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
20 May 2012, 5:01 am
Gupta argued that the language of the indictment, including phrases such as “at least approximately 350,000 shares,” and “certain Galleon Funds,” violated his Fifth Amendment rights by allowing the government to prove charges based on evidence that may not have been presented to the Grand Jury. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
“Implicit in this rule are two requirements: (1) that the plaintiff is a taxpayer; and (2) that public funds are expended on the allegedly illegal activity. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:23 pm
The partnership was created to fund the trust. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:00 am
(c) It is an exception to prosecution under Subsection (a) or (b) that the person's conduct is authorized by the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct or any rule of court. [read post]
