Search for: "FELLOWS v. STATE"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 4,570
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 10:59 am
United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), Justice Scalia applied the rule first formulated in Katz v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
State, 181 Md. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 9:00 pm
State, 181 Md. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:30 pm
Gaitis With the issuance of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Rent-a-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am
Although Plumer later claimed that he did this so as to ensure that George Washington remained the only man unanimously elected President of the United States, it seems more likely that the former Federalist Plumer was dissatisfied with the continuation of the so-called “Virginia Dynasty” through which the Democrat-Republicans had controlled the presidency since 1801, and instead cast his votes for his fellow former Federalists, Adams and Rush. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:52 am
President and Fellows of Harvard College (2023). [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 11:19 am
In the 1864 case of Gelpke v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:41 pm
The Privy Council has not announced any judgments for hand down this week, but the following judgments were handed down on Wednesday 10 March 2011: John Thompson and Janet Thompson v Goblin Hill Hotels Limited (from the Court of Appeal of Jamaica), heard 20 January 2011; and AK Investment CJSC v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited and Others; Altimo Holdings and Investments Limited v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited and Others; CP Credit Prive SA v Kyrgyz Mobil Tel Limited and… [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 11:12 am
In Alden v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
Fellow blogger, tweeter and IP enthusiast Thomas Dubuissontells us about a larger than life dispute between Google and Oracle that is rumbling through the courts in the US. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:02 pm
The DSM Directive provides a current example of this: its provisions are so complex that in essence the “battlefield” has moved from Strasbourg and Brussels to the Member States that will need to transpose the directive.Sophie then asked the panel a recap of the 3 best and worst contributions by the CJEU.The best 3 contributions of the CJEU according to Eleonora were:The dialogue between the CJEU and the national courts, which at times has been unavoidable (eg where the language… [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454, 456 (Fla. 1968). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:30 pm
Fellows, 209 So. 2d 454, 456 (Fla. 1968). [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 12:01 pm
I would like to draw attention to a striking similarity between generative AI and biological models, particularly in the context of the pending Supreme Court case of Amgen v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 10:16 am
Wisconsin v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:56 am
As Judge Posner wrote in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 6:28 am
Due to his focus on DWI defense, James now dedicates significant time to educating fellow attorneys on how to aggressively attack DWI charges as a defense lawyer. [read post]
