Search for: "In Interest of Ac"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 2,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2024, 9:01 pm
Parties’ arguments MUR’s position was that the question whether (in the absence of express language to that effect) reasonable endeavours provisos in FMCs should extend to offers of non-contractual performance is a point of principle with general application, and that, in the interest of certainty, reasonable endeavour provisos should not so extend. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 10:46 am
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2024. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 8:24 pm
For President Milei, that totem was capitalism, represented by the anarchy of the market ordered around the consequential effects of individual pursuit of personal interest within networked collectives of political, social, religious, and cultural power manifested through institutions also maximizing interests within competitive markets of their own. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:27 am
Interested parties might find it useful to supply an answer to the questionnaire, especially those who might seek to broaden the conceptual perspective at the foundation of this project, especially with respect to the role of business and civil society in this enterprise. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 12:09 pm
(3) Could a company with no proprietary interest in the property be a landlord? [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:27 pm
There are some interesting points of tension, to which I’ll return. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In the general interest of certainty in the law we must be sure that there is some very good reason before we so act. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:08 pm
Ace Am. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
During 2014 and 2015, Ukraine paid USD$233,333,350 by way of interest repayments in respect of the loan. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am
In the general interest of certainty in the law we must be sure that there is some very good reason before we so act. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am
National Association of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd [1982] AC 617, [at 10] and noted the particular relevance to the instant case of McCourt [2020] EWHC 2320 (Admin). [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
Public interest factors are also playing out in the courts. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 11:46 am
And as bad as these things are its one-liners are even worse; its tagline “fear is the trigger” is the best they could come up with, so you can imagine how the rest of them are.Here is the trailer for anyone who is interested: Extreme sports guys defeating Bosnian war terrorist and his cronies = PRETTY RIDICULOUS.#4. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
3 Aug 2006, 6:05 am
" La Corte, al caracterizar este derecho como "fundamental" para "la vida y futuro" de una mujer, sostuvo que el estado no puede interferir con las decisiones de abortar, a menos que tenga una "razón imperiosa" (compelling state interest) para regularla. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:33 am
Thus, the Kinder Morgan case, settled in August 2010 for $200 million (refer here); the Del Monte case settled in September 2011 for $89 million (refer here); the May 2010 ACS settlement was $69 million (refer here); and the 2011 Intermix Media settlement was $45 million (refer here). [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
“At bottom, ‘diversity’ as articulated by its proponents is too amorphous to constitute a compelling state interest that satisfies the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am
(Interesting to note is the fact that Supreme Court Justice E. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 10:31 am
This is an interesting legal issue, but one that is beyond the scope of this discussion. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
If we are trying to figure out who is depriving whom of “property,” then it is just as plausible to say that the employees “harming” Hobby Lobby by trespassing on the company’s RFRA-defined entitlement to withhold company revenue as to say that Hobby Lobby is “harming” the employees by embezzling their ACA-defined entitlement to insurance.The concept of “harm,” in short, invites circular arguments about which law, ACÁ or RFRA,… [read post]
