Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 1861 - 1880 of 37,174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
The Eleventh Amendment states: 8 The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State. 9 U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 5:00 am by Amanda L. Tyler
On Dec. 11, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia heard arguments in ACLU v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:05 pm
So earlier today I mentioned the cert grant in Salazar v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 5:47 pm
I recently came across a fascinating Fourth Amendment decision, Frank v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by CMS
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 7:44 am by John Jascob
” Here, according to the petitioners, the statutory context is clear: Congress reserves the power to preempt state law for categories of securities. [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 12:44 pm by ACLU
United States means that any president can now use their official powers to commit crimes under the assumption they are now presumptively immune. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 10:44 am
An employee who claims to have suffered injuries proximately caused by a previously identified and unremedied structural defect or unsafe condition affecting an item of power-operated heavy equipment or machinery has stated a cause of action under Labor Law §241(6) based on an alleged violation of 12 NYCRR 23-9.2(a), held the Court of Appeals in Misicki v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
Pro-immigrant advocates – and I count myself among them – will be anxiously listening to oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 4:57 pm by charley foster
KIUC is charged with nine counts each of taking threatened species in violation of 16 USC §§ 1538(a)(1)(G) and 1540(b)(1) and Title 50, Code of Federal Regulations, § 17.31(c) and (a); and taking migratory birds in violation of 16 USC §§ 703(a), 707(a).I haven't had time to do more than scan it and I'm no expert at environmental law - especially endangered species (we'll learn about it together as the case progresses) - but I notice that many of the… [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 2:36 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
In relation to the USA’s final ground of appeal he stated that the submission that the 1995 Regulations went beyond the Secretary of State’s powers in protecting employees of public administrative establishments without trade union representation would also be rejected. [read post]