Search for: "State v. Board of Education"
Results 1861 - 1880
of 5,145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2015, 1:58 pm
Arthur V. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:42 pm
Hancock County Board of Education, et al.Docket: 12-13628 Opinion Date: July 12, 2013 Judge: Pryor Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Labor & Employment Law Plaintiffs, the superintendent of education and her assistant superintendent, filed suit claiming that the board and its members in both their official and individual capacities terminated the superintendent and demoted the assistant superintendent in retaliation for public comments plaintiffs… [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:29 am
The Court expressly stated that it was not ruling on this question in its 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:19 am
Jeff Koons v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 5:41 am
Board of Education.In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 8:05 pm
Brotherhood of Railway Clerks (1984) and Lehnert v. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 4:52 am
The Supreme Court granted a stay of the Fourth Circuit’s decision in G.G. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 3:00 am
“Although the Supreme Court did not address the defendants’ contention that the amended complaint should be dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) for failure to state a cause of action, we reach that issue as an alternative ground for affirmance (see Parochial Bus Sys. v Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., 60 NY2d 539, 544-546; Kauffman v Turner Constr. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:09 am
Div., Second Dept., 273 AD2d 396, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 766The Pell doctrine, typically used to test the reasonableness of a disciplinary penalty, basically states that a disciplinary penalty imposed by a public employer will be sustained unless it is found to be disproportionate to the offense [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d, 222].In the Rapkiewicz and Tiano appeals, the application of the Pell doctrine resulted in the Appellate Division… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:18 pm
Board of Education earlier in the semester, we talked about the ten-year saga that followed before the Court's decision was put into action. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm
With the Supreme Court’s much anticipated June 25, 2015 King v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 4:00 am
Board of Education, Index No. 20053/93, decided July 18, 1995] and Look v Board of Ed. of Lawrence School District, 140 AD2d 440.The court said that records demonstrated that the negotiated severance agreements were legitimate transactions, resolving a genuine dispute concerning the structure and organization of the village's police department in light of the fiscal situation of the village at the time.Justice Dunne also observed that the severance agreements… [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Grant County Board of Education Eastern District of Kentucky at CovingtonMcKEAGUE, Circuit Judge. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 7:07 am
Another is that the Montana Supreme Court viewed it as inappropriate to try to control the specific curriculum of the law school to ensure that there would be the advantage of diploma privilege of in-state law school graduates.Wisconsin adheres to this old tradition, if somewhat inconsistently—state bar controlling the curriculum (to a degree), an advantage for in-state graduates, a focus on state-specific law.This in-state v.… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:29 am
In North Haven Board of Education v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
When you read the complete text of Hamilton v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
§2111 of the Education Law is an example of a situation where "acceptance of the resignation" is mandated by statute. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 6:59 am
The same was true after the Access Copyright v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 12:59 am
New York City Board of Education KINGS COUNTYFamily Law Mother on Active Military Duty Not Entitled To Stay of Action Under Military Law §340 KCF v. [read post]
