Search for: "Jump v State" Results 1881 - 1900 of 3,387
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
The Supreme Court decision in Re W (Children) [2010] UKSC 12 is one of those cases that is likely to get family lawyers jumping up and down with excitement, but is it likely to have much practical effect? [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 pm by Howard Bashman
And you can access at this link the transcript of today’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 7:49 am by Dave
Charles Terence Estates Ltd v Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 2542 (QB) (subnom oh dear, oh dear)Forgive the length of this note, but this seems to be a significant case with potentially far-reaching ramifications. [read post]
10 Nov 2019, 7:00 am by Seamus Hughes, Devorah Margolin
Prior to the ruling, federal courts were able to prosecute individuals as young as 15 for material support, but in the wake of the Sessions v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  I’ll just jump to the conclusion: I do not believe that discounts are appropriate in an oppression buyout. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:35 pm
" ; xiv) Look for window to jump out of. [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 8:06 pm
Likewise there is an almost obsessive interest in patent litigation in the United States, where the subject lies somewhere between a cottage industry and an art form, with ever-shifting guidance concerning injunctions, damages, patent eligibility and the interrelationship of patent suits with the sale price of patents singly or in bundles. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 2:00 pm
Now, wouldn't the average consumer, seeing the mark JUMPSTAR in relation to a battery charger, jump straight to the conclusion that it was actually "jumpstart", or something similar. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 8:21 am by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:06 pm by Jason Shinn
What this means for Employers Employers and HR professionals should read the entire EEOC v Ford Motor Co. opinion. [read post]