Search for: "King v. State"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 6,214
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2012, 8:22 pm
King v. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 7:00 am
King v. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 4:54 am
Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 3:34 am
In Quijano v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
MJJG Restaurant, LLC v Horry County, 102 F. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:02 pm
Back in 1215 King John was made to sign off on it.To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.The perhaps-Gladstonian phrase crossed the Atlantic at least by 1924 when the Ohio Supreme Court used it in Gohman v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
In Mrkulic v Peters 2023 NY Slip Op 33930(U) November 2, 2023Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 505025/2020Judge Debra Silber points out a vast number of errors that took place before she was assigned to the case. [read post]
9 May 2010, 6:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 12:39 am
Amato NASSAU COUNTYLand Use and PlanningCourt Finds Claim for Unconstitutionally Vague Ordinance Is Stated by Vendor Party Magic Enterprises Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:40 pm
Alabama, 10-9085, in which the Court had previously requested the record, and King v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:29 am
City v Maryland Cas. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 1:54 am
In DISMISSING the appeal, the Appellate Term, Second Department, stated: Here, defendant sought a protective order and the court denied its motion, affording plaintiff the full relief sought in opposition (see Atlantic Hudson Realty v Rhodes, 271 AD2d 558 [2000]). [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 1:24 pm
See King v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Texas v. [read post]
27 May 2014, 9:56 am
SEC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has proposed what he delightfully calls the No Kings Act, the putative purpose of which is to reverse the Supreme Court’s presidential criminal immunity ruling in Trump v. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 9:51 am
This result is different from that previously reached in the United States in the case of Quality King Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:42 am
Attorneys for Mayberry; Peter Campbell King, and Donna L. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:30 am
In Frankel v. [read post]
