Search for: "People v. Shorts" Results 1881 - 1900 of 8,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2009, 3:56 am
It also seems to stand in contrast to the apparently more tepid attitude towards the grant of stays exhibited the High Court in Akai Pty Ltd v People's Insurance Co. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:18 pm by Scott Hervey
  For example, in the 1979 Federal district case, Brilliant v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
In short, what was termed detrimental reliance was a benefit, 'at least in part'. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:06 pm by NL
In short, what was termed detrimental reliance was a benefit, 'at least in part'. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
Rihanna contended that the sale of the t-short amounted to passing off as a substantial number of people buying it would think that she had endorsed it when she has not. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:43 am by J
Lewison LJ added a short (but important) point about how this would interact with the slip rule (which, he suggested, may be much broader that most people think).* So, there we have it. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:43 am by J
Lewison LJ added a short (but important) point about how this would interact with the slip rule (which, he suggested, may be much broader that most people think).* So, there we have it. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Counterbalances the removal of “short” before quotation. [read post]