Search for: "State v. Person" Results 1881 - 1900 of 76,023
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2008, 9:41 pm
The president of the United States may be the most powerful person in the world, but as the Supreme Court made clear in Medellin v. [read post]
9 Jul 2016, 6:52 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Personal injury lawsuits target Snapchat, June 25, 2016, Inside Counsel, By Amanda Ciccatelli More Blog Entries: Wilkins v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 7:17 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Colvin, June 24, 2016, United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit More Blog Entries: Crespo v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 8:49 am
King (Registration as sex defender; conspiracy to commit trafficking in persons; motion to correct illegal sentence) State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:49 am
  [6] Protocol II, Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 287. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 3:49 pm
EvidenceProf focused on a different portion of the opinion:The Seventh Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:25 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The Sixth Circuit's opinion in Theile v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:59 am
In Jones v Saudi Arabia the House of Lords concluded that the legal test for establishing the requisite connection between the impugned acts of the foreign state official and the foreign state as a corporate entity should be supplied by the rules of attribution in the law of state responsibility. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 7:13 am by John Day
In most if not all states, the settlement of a minor's personal injury claim must be approved by the Court. [read post]
First Circuit affirmed a decision to dismiss a trademark suit brought by Motus LLC against CarData Consultants Inc. for a lack of personal jurisdiction, and because alleged trademark infringement was not shown to be an intentional tort within the forum state. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court cited SHAD Alliance v Smith Haven Mall, 66 NY2d 496, in which the Court of Appeal held that in order for a plaintiff to maintain such an action the plaintiff would have to allege facts that would show that the State [1] "is so entwined with the regulation of the private conduct as to constitute State activity"; [2] that "there is meaningful State participation in the activity"; or [3] that "there has been a delegation of what has… [read post]