Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 1881 - 1900
of 3,618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 5:56 am
” However, entry to the United States under that statute is limited to two years. [read post]
21 May 2009, 11:44 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
The question for the justices is about “the proper test for determining whether wetlands are ‘waters of the United States’ under the Clean Water Act. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:06 pm
” In 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Pryor to serve on the United States Sentencing Commission and he currently serves as Acting Chair. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
Deportation Update: Biden Has Given Prosecutors More Power To Decide Which Immigration Cases To Drop
7 Jun 2021, 11:35 am
(Meza Morales 7th Cir, 2020; Romero v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:54 pm
” His blog posts have cited conspiracy theories and false information, including references to the claim that President Obama was not born in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
There is extensive documentation on the stance of the European Patent Office (EPO) and comparisons between the EPO and its Japanese and United States equivalents. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 5:58 pm
MICHEL BAGARAGAZA, Case No.: ICTR-2005-86-I, ORDER FOR THE CONTINUED DETENTION OF MICHEL BAGARAGAZA AT THE ICTY DETENTION UNIT IN THE HAGUE, THE NETHERLANDS, 17 August 2006 THE PROSECUTOR v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:10 am
K 5410 T6 L65 2011 Transnational torture : law, violence, and state power in the United States and India Jinee Lokaneeta. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:20 am
Hence morality, and humanity insofar as it is capable of morality, is that which alone has dignity. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
, Lucas v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
There is much to comment on from the various case studies, and although Professor Cheng claims to take a politically moderate view (p. 16), some will have their eyebrows raised by, or take exception to, his extensive criticism of the ICJ’s judgment in the Nicaragua case (pp. 141-162); the suggestion that the award of the NAFTA tribunal in Loewen v United States is in part defensible as it “reduc[ed] the risk that the United States would… [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 8:00 am
Jane posted a summary of two United States Signals Intelligence Directives (USSID) continuing Lawfare’s coverage of the latest ODNI declassification trove. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States, shareholder primacy continues to define the legal standard.[15] “While many deplored the disconnect between corporate power and social need, and CSR . . . became a more frequent discussion topic in corporate and academic circles, not many corporations acted meaningfully in pursuing CSR. [read post]
14 Oct 2023, 1:01 am
As the Court later found in United States v. [read post]
