Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 2,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2006, 12:19 pm
(Oh, I know, you just apply the clear guidance of Phillips v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 8:24 am
On its face, this is a very strange claim, as Richard notes. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
Strangely enough, I think everyone will be excited by the content, even your brothers. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:15 pm
Finally, the state legislature of the state wherein the land is located would then have to approve the agreement. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:18 am
On the one hand, this has broadly overlooked the peculiarly public role of those denominational schools recognised and funded by the State under the Education Act 1998 – in this light, they essentially represent the conduits for the provision of public education in this state, and should belong in the “public” sphere for constitutional purposes. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
(For contemporary illustrations of this point, see the interpretation recently promulgated by Bishop Mark Lawrence, or the statement of Bishop Shaw on gay marriage in his diocese, or the court's decision in the Dixon v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
But courts do the interpreting under the court order standard, so diversity of state laws is not the issue.) [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 11:44 am
It takes its name from the famous case, Desny v. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:59 am
” That’s more than a little strange, and bear in mind that “[t]he Board, being thoroughly familiar with current case law, will apply the correct case law,” In re Active Ankle Sys., Inc., 83 U.S.P.Q.2d 1532, 1534 (T.T.A.B. 2007), and that before issuing a precedential decision such as Uman, “[t]he Board engages in thorough internal review,” DC Comics v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 4:42 am
” The video is still strangely relevant (change Nader with Jill Stein and the same thing applies today). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:03 am
– Fisher v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In addition, there is a risk that a lawyer may not provide the independent advice and representation necessary to ensure the proper administration of justice (See, e.g., Regular v Law Society of Newfoundland and Labrador 2011 NLCA 54). [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
When I posed this hypothetical to a faculty colleague, I was advised that the courts would undoubtedly find a way to avoid such a strange construction.) [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 2:56 pm
(National Restaurant Association v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
In the Barnett/Blackman constitutional law casebook, we included this introduction to United States v. [read post]
