Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2011, 12:10 pm
”) (quot- ing United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:20 am
The style of the case is, Emma Benavides, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:50 pm
Earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court handed down a controversial decision upholding the President’s latest travel ban in the case Trump, President of the United States, Et Al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 2:57 pm
Hogan v. [read post]
12 Oct 2012, 4:59 am
”’ Holder v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Holder argument 1/19/2010 Wellons v. [read post]
12 Jun 2016, 2:43 pm
"On the importance of technical innovation relative to design, I like the following passage from the brief:"To state the obvious, the investment in research and development for information and communication technologies—currently estimated at $250 billion annually—extends well beyond design to include the hardware, software, and services that are incorporated into the technological products. [...] [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
Hogue v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 3:15 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
The new Term opened with Heien v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
The Court found Congress's purpose in enacting the NSPA was to `assist the States' efforts to foil the “roving criminal,” whose movement across state lines. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
25 May 2014, 7:50 am
David gave examples from Kohler Mira v Bristan Group [2013] EWPCC 2, Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWHC 1882 and Samsung Electronics (UK) Limited & Another v Apple Inc. [2012] EWCA Civ 1339 where dotted lines were held to indicate transparency. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:59 am
On 5 June 2014 the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its decision in the “Meltwater” Case C-360/13, (Public Relations Consultations Association Ltd (PRCA) v Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd (NLA) and Others). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 1:23 pm
Gutierrez and Holder v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 3:29 am
Gelman v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 2:20 pm
No. 17-1323 (MN).United States District Court, D. [read post]
1 May 2012, 11:34 am
(Eugene Volokh) So holds today’s Lewis v. [read post]
