Search for: "State v. Words"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 36,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am
Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:50 am
In the absence of express words, the extraterritorial application of legislation may be implied but there is a high threshold to overcome before any such implication. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 12:38 pm
And uses the right word every single time. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
To add more to the plain words of statute, to afford those words a meaning other than what ordinary English requires, seems to this Court to be unnecessary. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Judge Kozinski has written compelling and impressive dissents before—the 1993 White v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 7:03 am
Like its federal counterpart, Military Rule of Evidence 612 permits an attorney to refresh a witness' recollection with a "writing," with courts liberally construing the word "writing" to include basically anything (e.g., a photograph, food, or a piece of music).... [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 5:30 am
U.S. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
The Court ruled in Pliva v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:44 am
Thanks so much to Professor Neil Richards (who generously serves as our First Amendment guest expert) for his thoughts on Snyder v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
In March of 2011, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a ruling in the case of Cohn v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 4:03 pm
” In March of 2011, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a ruling in the case of Cohn v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 2:14 pm
Supreme Court decisions issued on the same day: Faragher v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 1:29 pm
Earlier today, the United States Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 2:02 pm
Ct. 586, 597 (2007); and United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 7:21 am
” But—as seen by this decision—the word “issue” is still quite frequently used.Regarding motions to dismiss, the Supreme Court of the United States nearly a decade ago famously wrote that that the “no set of facts” standard described in Conley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 4:30 am
Pretka v. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 6:01 pm
(Perhaps South Dakota v. [read post]
17 May 2020, 9:01 pm
Attacking state employees is a Republican imperative, it seems.It is not, in other words, the typical “states’ rights” rhetoric that we are hearing from Republicans: feds bad, states good. [read post]
