Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 1901 - 1920
of 7,080
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Harding's pardon of Eugene V. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 2:22 pm
In the past few weeks, the Supreme Court has heard two cases that examine the role of Congress in ensuring voting rights: Shelby County v. [read post]
1 Jun 2013, 2:03 pm
But for the reasons I explained in a previous post, all those Google-supporting amici (the ones on that list and all others) fail to counterbalance the economic weight of those supporting Oracle, and the EFF used FUD to mobilize people and companies for its cause. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 8:12 am
I’ve heard it before. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 9:08 am
Sellers v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:44 am
But, since the trial judge who heard the case determined that that did not occur, no biggie. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
The benefit cap JR got lost amongst that other stuff partly because it was almost predictable after MA that the Divisional Court would find a way to uphold it.Actually, though, having read it again the other day for a different reason, the benefit cap challenge – R(JS) v SSWP [2013] EWHC 3350 (QB) – was very clever (CPAG and Shelter were joined as interveners – CPAG’s arguments can be found here) and the appeal is to be heard pretty soon, having… [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 2:55 pm
" Floyd v. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 7:04 am
In 2000, just before the Bush v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 10:28 pm
There are nonetheless certain portions of the opinion that seem both doctrinally wrong as well as substantially pernicious in other cases, at least to people (like me) who are seriously concerned with legal ethics.Here, an indigent person called up a public interest organization (California Indian Legal Services) to seek its representation in a lawsuit she wanted to file against her brother regarding a property dispute. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:02 pm
We want people to have their claims heard on the merits, rather than dismissed for a legal reason that we got wrong, and denying res judicata to the second (totally identical) suit solves the problem. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:16 am
State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 3:17 pm
’” (Citing Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:19 am
Will Jackson provide the reliable liberal vote that many people expect from her? [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 10:03 am
By Eric Goldman S.C. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am
Yesterday the justices heard two Fourth Amendment cases, both involving searches of motor vehicles. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 5:00 am
Fortunately, in Neeley v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm
On Monday the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
By now, you’ve probably heard of the “Free Bieber” Campaign. [read post]
