Search for: "Blank v. Blank" Results 1921 - 1940 of 1,998
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPBiz),US: Two remaining challenged WARF embryonic stem cell patents upheld in ex parte reexamination: (Holman's Biotech IP Blog), Pharma & Biotech - ProductsAricept (Donepezil) – USV wins appeal against USPTO decision: (Spicy IP),Celerex (Celecoxib) – CAFC decision in Celebrex patents dispute between Pfizer and Teva will cut patent term by one and a half years: (Patent Baristas), Inersan – Ranbaxy in-licenses Inersan to CD Pharma to market in India and… [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
"[A]nalogical reasoning under the Second Amendment is neither a regulatory straightjacket nor a regulatory blank check. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 9:34 am by Howard Knopf
 Maître Audet, the Board’s General Counsel, noted some possible questions arising from the pending SCC York University v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:06 pm by Howard Knopf
That’s not really much of a concession since the use of photocopied course packs is rapidly becoming obsolete, rather like blank CDs. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access Control Technologies, Section 1201 Hearing Proposed Classes to be discussed: 7F. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm by lawmrh
[iv] “Every other U.S. industry that has been deregulated, from trucking to telephones, has lowered prices for consumers without sacrificing quality,”[v] they further proclaimed. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read --… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:03 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read --… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
 The Kat is question is Darren Smyth (EIP), who only a few days ago rested his posting paws after a tiring six-month stint as one of three guest Kats for the first half of the year and who now, to the great pleasure of us all, has just presented the blog with a hot-off-the-press analysis of this morning's ruling of Judge Birss QC, sitting as a Patents Court judge, in Samsung Electronics UK v Apple Inc [2012] EWHC 1882 (Pat), which is fully illustrated and fun to read --… [read post]