Search for: "Doctor v. State" Results 1921 - 1940 of 8,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2021, 12:28 pm by Mary Ziegler
ShareMary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
Biden signed the executive order Monday in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 8:00 am
Rule 9(b) states that "[i]n alleging fraud or mistake, a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
Her doctors stated that the preexisting condition was temporarily aggravated by the chemicals, but not worsened. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
The Court of Appeals recently reversed a trial court’s decision awarding benefits outside of the statutory schedule in American Cast Iron Pipe Company v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:02 am by Steven Cohen
  The court agrees, stating that Hebert will not be permitted to offer an opinion regarding the plaintiff’s medical treatment, because he is not a medical doctor. [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Monday ruled in favor of drug companies in landmark case City of Huntington, West Virginia v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 3:54 pm
This posting was written by Mark Engstrom, Editor of CCH RICO Business Disputes Guide.A provider of rail-based transportation services (CSX Transportation, Inc.) sufficiently alleged RICO violations by three lawyers and a doctor, all of whom allegedly orchestrated a scheme to inundate CSX with thousands of asbestos-related occupational illness claims throughout the state of West Virginia, the federal district court in Wheeling, West Virginia, has ruled. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
Interestingly, the case was tried before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Atlantic Sounding Co. v. [read post]