Search for: "Free v. State" Results 1921 - 1940 of 35,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 8:55 am
Regina (Corner House Research and Another) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office House of Lords “Where he took the view that protecting the lives of British citizens outweighed the public interest in pursuing an investigation into allegations of corruption, the Director of the Serious Fraud Office had been entitled to exercise his discretion to discontinue the corruption investigation following threats by a foreign state as to consequences affecting national security if… [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 7:24 am
This issue of citizenship which challenged free black men in their pursuit to procure patent rights was decided by the Supreme Court in 1857 with Justice Taney’s opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 11:55 am by Thomas James
The United States Constitution, however, also protects rights of speech and press freedom. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 5:21 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
 The Court rejected the photographers' state law and First Amendment defenses (freedom of speech and free exercise). [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am by Howard Knopf
(Counsel in black robes preparing for Supreme Court oral argument - with apologies to the IPKat)All eyes will be on the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) on Monday, October 29, 2012 when it will hear oral argument in the immensely important case of  Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 12:50 am by Tristan Marot
The Free State High Court confirms in J.H.V v Centlec (SOC) Ltd and Others that an acknowledgement of liability by the debtor interrupts prescription, even if the acknowledgement is not made directly to the creditor. [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 10:33 am by Eugene Volokh
” Here is the Virginia AG’s statement: Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has decided not to join other states in an amicus brief on behalf of Albert Snyder in Snyder v. [read post]
27 Mar 2021, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
‘Steep hill to climb’ In a landmark First Amendment case almost 60 years ago, New York Times v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:17 am
Taxpayer not entitled to reduce VAT Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v BUPA Purchasing Ltd and Others Court of Appeal “Where the Commissioners for Revenue and Custome had made a value-added tax assessment and the time limit for making any further assessment had passed before they became aware that further input tax was deductible, the taxpayer was not entitled to reduce the amount of VAT stated due in the assessment to take account of output tax which had not yet… [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 6:33 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” The Supreme Court barely contemplated the text’s meaning in Heller v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:33 am by Eugene Volokh
” As a result, courts before incorporation could and did consider whether state government action violated its state religious freedom provisions, state free speech provisions, and so on. [read post]