Search for: "French v. State" Results 1921 - 1940 of 2,939
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 447 So.2d 1301, 1303 (Ala. 1984).California: Carlin v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
The hospital’s chief executive stated that “all appropriate regulatory and disciplinary steps will be taken and Kensington Palace confirmed that the report was “a matter for the London Clinic. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:19 am
  In a letter posted on one of China's major web portals, Sina.com, Zong said a trademark-license contract must be approved by the Trademark Office of the State Administration For Industry and Commerce but he never submitted the original which restricts China's largest drink producer from independently expanding. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
  Roy Greenslade suggests that the damages of €15,000 shows that French privacy law is not to be feared. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  French want to throw shoppers in jail. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:24 pm by legalinformatics
Sci, Regis University: Between French and Islamic Law: Cennet Doganay’s Embodied Argument and le Loi 2004-228. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The High Court has ruled that security and intelligence services must obtain “prior independent authorisation” to access individuals’ communication data from telecommunications companies (Liberty v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] EWHC 1630 (Admin)). [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 11:34 pm by Florian Mueller
It was originally supposed to be about various motions, and Judge Curiel made it clear that all those Rule 44.1 motions relating to questions under French law (governing the ETSI FRAND declaration) were basically summary judgment motions in disguise and he'd need more time to rule on them. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 3:44 am by SHG
David French suggested that an admissions process, openly crafted to effectuate intentional racial discrimination, was “race neutral” and constitutional might reflect the Supreme Court’s effort after Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]