Search for: "Laing v. United States"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 11:50 am
" The claim that the 7 ½-foot tall high-power microwave device — dubbed the "Pain Ray" by the media — will cause no injury is highly dubious, to say the least: There is good evidence from the United States military that it is capable of inflicting not only intolerable pain, but death. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 7:27 am
“ On November 30, 2021, in State of Louisiana v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Md. 2012) (same); New York State Pesticide Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 6:35 am
City of LA, 2024 Cal. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
We already did that in connection with the original decision in Conte v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
Justice Ginsburg (picture, left) stated"What earthly sense would it make to prefer goods that are manufactured abroad over those manufactured in the United States? [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am
nal : dossier, la bioe? [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 8:52 am
Tom Udall (D-NM) and David Vitter (R-LA) to update the federal chemicals safety law. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
At the hearing, the parties argued the import of the recent decision of State of Missouri v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 8:57 am
"waters of the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 9:20 am
Granville (2000) 530 U.S. 57, decided by the United States Supreme Court almost twelve years ago. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:00 am
: L’Oréal v Bellure (IPKat) Is the ruling in L’Oréal v Bellure against the law? [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
AbortionKF228.R59 H85 2010Roe v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:02 am
The first one is authored by Nabil Ferjani and Véronique Huet and discusses the impact of embargo United Nation decisions on the performance of international contracts (L’impact de la décision onusienne d’embargo sur l’exécution des contrats internationaux). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:15 am
, Isaacs v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 2:48 am
Go back to this post from August about United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
In support of this opposition, eBay cites Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay Inc., 506 F3d 1165 (9th Cir., Nove. 5, 2007) where the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals stated that the term "BAY" was the dominant portion of the eBay mark. [read post]
