Search for: "Laws v. State" Results 1921 - 1940 of 156,225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
And in the absence of such state receptivity there is no way a federal court can require or compel a state court to answer state-law questionsBut in 1974 in Lehman Brothers v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:56 pm by laborprof lpb
Beth Burch (Florida State) has posted on SSRN her introduction to the Dukes v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 1:31 pm by Adam Steinman
Louisiana will primarily be of interest to criminal law/procedure folks: the main takeaway is that the Constitution requires a unanimous jury verdict in order for states to convict a defendant of a... [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:28 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Marder (Illinois Institute of Technology - Chicago-Kent College of Law) has posted Foster v. [read post]
20 May 2020, 5:29 am by Gerard Magliocca
Saunders, an 1827 Supreme Court case which concluded that states could enact bankruptcy laws that applied prospectively. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:26 am
Judge Wallace begins his concurrence by stating that Judge Paez's dissent "reads like a law review outline of relevant law. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 1:48 am
Regina (Age UK) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, Equality and Human Rights Commission and Another intervening) Queen’s Bench Division “Provisions permitting an employer to require retirement at the age of 65 were justified where he could show that the treatment was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim since the government had [...] [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 1:46 am
Regina v Evans (Gemma) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “For the purposes of gross negligence manslaughter, when a person had created or contributed to the creation of a state of affairs which he knew, or ought to have known had become life-threatening to another person, a consequent duty would normally arise on him to act by taking [...] [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 6:47 am by Gabrielle Kolencik
Garcia that federal immigration law does not preempt a state prosecution for identity theft. [read post]