Search for: "People v. Lines" Results 1921 - 1940 of 12,018
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:14 am by JB
The most promising line of attack, however was the challenge to federal tax credits that led to King v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:49 am by Derek Muller
It is, of course, true that if more people vote early, Election Day turnout is lower; and if Election Day turnout is lower, then long lines are less likely. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am by INFORRM
He began by describing modern democratic government as: “government of the people by the people for the people. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
If a Court finds that 2 or more people are responsible for a motor vehicle collision in British Columbia the Court must ‘apportion’ liability as between them. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 1:27 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareAs expected, Wednesday’s argument in Jack Daniel’s Properties v VIP Products showcased the justices grappling with line-drawing. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:26 am by David Gans
  Demanding that state and local governments across the nation change the way they draw legislative lines, Evenwel argues that it is unconstitutional for states to draw districts based on total population, creating districts of substantially equal numbers of people. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
 The fallacy that courts are able to reliably determine where that line is, as shown by the conviction of Mr. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:25 am by Sherry F. Colb
"It is worth reviewing SA's line of "reasoning" here. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 3:20 am by Lindsey Meuser Rowland
Today most people assume that PTSD results from a single traumatic incident or exposure in the line of duty. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:24 am by Richard Primus
Twenty years ago, the Supreme Court in Clinton v. [read post]