Search for: "See v. See" Results 1921 - 1940 of 122,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:17 am by Ben
QC Leisure, she held that, as QC Leisure had effectively decided the plea in this defence, FAPL had a right to prevent the unauthorised communication of its copyright (see here for previous coverage on the High Court case). [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 11:55 am
To see the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department decisions (including index) released on April 17, 2008, click on the links below: Appeals Index Slip Opinions 04-17-08 People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
  See, e.g., Opinion at 8 ("We are disappointed to see such a retrograde position taken by a company whose reputation is built on service to the public. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 2:14 pm by Barry Sookman
For tech lawyers like me and many readers of this blog, it’s a rare treat when a Canadian court construes an IT contract and opines on clauses we see in agreements all the time. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 8:12 am by David Canton
  For more detail see the Jones v Tsige decision (pdf), and commentary by David Fraser and All About Information. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 1:48 pm
See SCOTUSBlog coverage here and opinion here.I think CAAF will need to re-look at the rule in United States v. [read post]