Search for: "State v. Board of Education" Results 1921 - 1940 of 5,145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports that the justices “sent two sets of cases about aid to religious schools back to lower courts for reconsideration in light of their opinion on Monday that a church preschool could not be excluded from a state grant program to improve playgrounds. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 3:12 pm by Robert Epstein
The Texas Supreme Court identified several factors courts should consider in Murff v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 3:11 am by Lyle Denniston
Gloucester County School Board is the meaning of a 1964 federal civil rights law that outlaws discrimination “because of sex” in federally funded education. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Citing Wiggins v Board of Education, 60 NY2d 385, the court said that “[i]n the absence of a written delegation authorizing a deputy or other person to conduct the hearing, the removing board or officer has no jurisdiction to discipline an employee. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Steven Cohen
Herold stated that his findings were based on his education, training, and experience and that his conclusions are based on a national standard of care. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:41 am by Steven Cohen
Herold stated that his findings were based on his education, training, and experience and that his conclusions are based on a national standard of care. [read post]
14 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Board of Education, it is also presumptively a problematic basis to use in affirmative action programs which seek to benefit African Americans, albeit to the material detriment of other groups such as white persons. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Today the justices will hear argument in one case, United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
Board of Education: "What's exactly wrong if people are separate but equal? [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 The Appellate Division concluded that the arbitration provision of the CBA at issue was broad and that there was a reasonable relationship between the subject matter of the dispute, which involves the EO1's claim that its members are entitled to certain payments for retroactive salary increases, and the general subject matter of the CBA.Noting that some uncertainty existed as to whether the subject matter of the dispute is encompassed within the salary provisions of EO1's CBA or… [read post]