Search for: "State v. York" Results 1921 - 1940 of 32,083
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am by Sarah Aberg and Kate Ross
” People v Federated Radio Corp., 244 N.Y. 33, 38-39 (1926); see also State of New York v Sonifer Realty Corp., 212 A.D.2d 366, 367 (1st Dep’t 1995). [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 11:13 am by Sarah Aberg and Kate Ross
” People v Federated Radio Corp., 244 N.Y. 33, 38-39 (1926); see also State of New York v Sonifer Realty Corp., 212 A.D.2d 366, 367 (1st Dep’t 1995). [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
Facts GMCI is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, doing business at 2 Penn Plaza, New York, New York. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 9:37 am by Kevin Sheerin
Pitts II v City of New York Office of Comptroller Pursuant to Article 78, petitioner sought the court to review a decision of the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) stating that he had violated New York City Health Code. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:23 am
Federal District Court issues TRO baring the furloughing of state workers by Executive Order Donohue v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, CV-00543A federal district court judge, concluding that the unions' actions alleging proposed actions by the Governor would violate the rights of the employees they represent in violation of Article I.10.1 of the U.S. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:14 pm
Federal District Court issues TRO baring the furloughing of state workers by Executive OrderDonohue v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, CV-00543A federal district court judge, holding that the union's action alleging proposed actions by the Governor would violate the rights of the employees they represent in violation of Article 1.10.1 of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 3:00 am
During the February Session, the New York Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in Ramos v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:39 pm
On August 3, 2011, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted a motion for the recognition of an arbitral award in the matter Continental Transfert Technique Ltd. v. [read post]