Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Davis"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 2,078
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Lin, Professor of Law, University of California, Davis, School of Law—Community Levers for Benefit Sharing James N. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this series, I explained why last week’s opinions in Chiafalo v. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 5:23 am
General Michael Flynn) to Implement this policy.In the oral argument in the presidential immunity case, Trump v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 9:02 pm
But for a recent example of the problems that arise when people speak before thinking these issues through, see this prior column that one of us (Amar) wrote.4. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
A Response to Masterpiece Cakeshop In the case before the Supreme Court, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court in Kokesh v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am
And there are real people in those jobs, people with families to feed. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
21 Sep 2004, 11:36 pm
This issue is dealt with in Park Place Estates v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:21 am
Costs v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Bill 1X 26; see also Professional Engineers in California Government v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:44 pm
Russo and Espinoza v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
In its 1989 decision in Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
