Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 1921 - 1940 of 6,171
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2007, 12:14 am
Realty LLC NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice Information Lacked Sufficient Allegations Defendant Knowingly Committed Falsely Reporting an Incident People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 11:32 am
In my view, a not insubstantial number of people is likely to have done so. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
Often these were people who were illiterate or uneducated. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:35 am by Jon Hyman
If you want an example of the type of misconduct the article chronicles, look no further than EEOC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 10:01 am by Steve Bainbridge
My friend and fellow Salvatori Fellow Brad Smith (former Chair of the Federal Elections Committee) has a WSJ op-ed on this week's SCOTUS decision in Citizen United v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
The controlling provisions in the CBA provided that "[a]ll present retirees … and all members who retire in the future shall continue to receive Blue Cross, Blue Shield Major Medical Insurance coverage for themselves and their dependents (or comparable coverage as may then be in effect). [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 8:54 am by Florian Mueller
The U.S. district court will hold a trial in December, and the purpose of the injunction is to bar Huawei from leveraging two Chinese patent injunctions (granted by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court) before Judge Orrick has the chance to adjudicate a related claim.Like in the court below, Quinn Emanuel, as counsel for Samsung, is defending the Microsoft v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:15 pm
In 2014, Justice Kennedy remarked on the role of disparate impact in Texas DHCA v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judgesNever Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14 and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 12:17 am
Lewie Decisions of Interest NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Patron's Own Actions May Have Caused InjuriesDenying Cross-Motion on Issue of Liability Meade v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 2:34 am
If anyone else has ever seen such a thing from a state's highest court, I'd love to hear about it.The decision is reproduced in full below (Scott Greenfield, loved the caption, People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm by Mitch Stoltz
People should be able to use copyrighted work in ways that benefit us all, without worrying that a court will bankrupt them if the court later decides they crossed a fuzzy line. [read post]