Search for: "United States v. Am" Results 1921 - 1940 of 7,109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2017, 11:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
United States, in which "the justices will ponder an unusual legal question: If a defendant pleads guilty to a crime, does he or she lose the right to challenge that crime’s constitutionality? [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:13 pm
The Congress of the United States named the federal courthouse in Miami in his honor. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:49 am by Susan Brenner
That same day, United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun Rice approved the warrant. . . . [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:46 am
" The petition raises this question: "Whether the Court of Appeals [Fourth Circuit] erred in affirmed the pleading-stage dismissal, on the basis of the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for petitioner's unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture by agents of the United States? [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:45 am by INFORRM
And he was Chief Executive of one the largest publicly quoted companies in the United Kingdom, doing business on a global scale. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
United States, 350 F.3d 299, 306 (2d Cir. 2003); accord County of Erie, 546 F.3d at 229; see also Bilzerian, 926 F.2d at 1292; von Bulow, 828 F.2d at 103; Am. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 7:17 am
United States and to statements made by Madison on the floor of the House during the statutory removal debates. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:04 am by Tarunabh Khaitan
Lest I be misunderstood, while I am prepared to hold that there is a constitutional obligation for the state to take effective measures to fight corruption, I am not prepared to narrowly construe the options available to the state in discharging that obligation.After discussing South Africa's obligations to tackle corruption under international law, in particular the UN Convention Against Corruption, the Court goes on to say:[105] As I understand it, the… [read post]