Search for: "V D"
Results 1921 - 1940
of 76,323
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Mar 2012, 2:59 am
Smith v Butler [2012] EWCA Civ 314; [2012] WLR (D) 96 “Where the terms of a managing director’s appointment to a company made no provision for the express delegation of any specific powers by the board of the company to him, although there might be an intention to implicitly delegate some powers to him, such delegation would not usually have the effect of excluding the powers of the board and the managing director had no implied power to suspend the company chairman or… [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Regina v Unah [2011] WLR (D) 225 “Where a defendant sought to rely on the defence of ‘reasonable excuse’ for the purposes of the offence of possessing a false identity document, contrary to section 25(5) of the Identity Cards Act 2006, the fact that the defendant did not know or believe that the document was false was not of itself a reasonable excuse. [read post]
27 May 2011, 2:54 am
Regina v Hull [2011] EWCA Crim 1261; [2011] WLR (D) 177 “Under section 3 of the Repatriation of Prisoners Act 1984 the Court of Appeal had jurisdiction, including power to quash the order of the High Court, in relation to a referral under section 273 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 of the sentence of a repatriated prisoner. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:29 am
Grand v Gill [2011] EWCA Civ 554; [2011] WLR (D) 172 “Plasterwork was part of the structure of a property, rather than being decoration. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:01 am
Emerald Supplies Ltd and another v British Airways plc [2010] EWCA Civ 1284; [2010] WLR (D) 294 “For a case to fall within CPR r 19.6, a claimant who had brought a representative action on behalf of the claimant and other representative claimants had to show at all stages of the proceedings that the interest of the claimant and all potential represented claimants was same. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:21 am
Regina (Coke-Wallis) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales [2011] UKSC 1 ; [2011] WLR (D) 3 “The principles of cause of action estoppel applied to successive complaints before a professional disciplinary body. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 2:17 am
Regina (Noone) v Governor of HMP Drake Hall and another [2010] UKSC 30; [2010] WLR (D) 164 “The release provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1991 applied to sentences of under 12 months’ imprisonment, unless they were imposed concurrently or consecutively with sentences of 12 months or over, in which case the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 applied. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:27 am
MAGA v Trustees of the Birmingham Archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church [2010] EWCA Civ 256; [2010] WLR (D) 76 “An archdiocese of the Roman Catholic Church was vicariously liable for the sexual abuse of a non-Catholic boy by a priest with special responsibility for youth work on the basis that there was a sufficient connection between the work he was employed to do and the abuse perpetrated. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 2:12 am
Nomihold Securities Inc v Mobile Telesystems Finance SA [2011] EWCA Civ 1040; [2011] WLR (D) 278 “Where a freezing order bound a party against whom an arbitral award had been made the position was not directly analogous to that of a ‘judgment debtor’ when the question fell to be determined whether the party owing the sum awarded should be permitted to make a payment out to a third party.” WLR Daily, 1st September 2011 Source:… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:40 am
The Oxford Legal Group Ltd v Sibbasbridge Services Plc and Another [2008] EWCA Civ 387; [2008] WLR (D) 121 “The court would refuse to enforce the right of a director to inspect a company's accounts pursuant to s 222 of the Companies Act 1985 where the purpose of the proposed inspection was to injure the company or was improper. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:04 am
Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK Ltd and another [2011] EWCA Civ 303; [2011] WLR (D) 115 “Where an invention was a product and one asked, for the purposes of section 60(1)(a) of the Patents Act 1977, whether a party had been ‘making’ a product, it was not appropriate to have regard to a ‘whole inventive concept’ test. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:44 am
Gard Marine and Energy Ltd v Tunnicliffe and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1052; [2010] WLR (D) 242 ”Where, by reference to the Lugano Convention and art 6(1) of the Judgments Regulation, one was considering whether it was expedient to hear and determine claims within the jurisdiction order to avoid the risk of irreconcilable judgments resulting from separate proceedings, regard was to be had, inter alia, to the question whether the claims arose out of the same situation in… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 3:32 am
Football Dataco Ltd and others v Sportradar GmbH and another [2010] EWHC 2911 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 293 “The act of making available to the public all or a substantial part of the contents of a database by online transmission within the meaning of art 7(2)(b) of Parliament and Council Directive 96/9/EC on the Legal Protection of Databases was committed and committed only where the transmission took place. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:51 am
Milebush Properties Ltd v Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 270; [2011] WLR (D) 96 “Although the court had a wide discretion to grant declaratory relief in diverse circumstances in both public and private law proceedings, where a party who was not a party to the contract brought private proceedings seeking declaratory relief to enforce a public authority’s planning obligation the court would not lend its assistance. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:42 am
Panday v Virgil (Senior Superintendent of Police) [2008] UKPC 24; [2008] WLR (D) 102 “The Court of Appeal might order the retrial of a defendant whose conviction was quashed on the grounds of apparent bias if the defendant had been properly charged and brought before the court without any violation of the rule of law and a fair retrial before a different judge was possible. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 2:29 am
Somerfield Stores Ltd v Spring (Sutton Coldfield) Ltd (in administration) [2010] EWHC 2094 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 231 “Where a landlord opposed the renewal of a tenancy under section 30(1)(f) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 on the ground that he intended to redevelop the land the date of the hearing at which the necessary intention had to be shown to exist was always the date of the substantive trial of the landlord’s ground of objection. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:58 am
Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Piggott (Lamb interested party) [2010] EWCA Civ 285; [2010] WLR (D) 84 “A court had jurisdiction to make a management receivership order over any property on the basis that it was realisable property where an issue was still to be determined between the Revenue and Customs Prosecution Office and an interested third party as to the beneficial interest in such property. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:37 am
Eastenders Cash and Carry plc and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWHC 2797 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 282 “The power of detention contained in s 139(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 was not limited to cases in which the goods in question were goods on which duty had not in fact been paid, but also covered cases in which there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that duty might not have been paid on the goods. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:11 am
Pirelli Cable Holding NV and others v Commissioners for Revenue and Customs [2008] EWCA Civ 70; [2008] WLR (D) 48 “The United Kingdom tax authorities had not assumed responsibility for eliminating double taxation on the dividend paid by a UK subsidiary to a parent resident in the Netherlands or Italy in circumstances where the UK had not levied corporation tax on the dividend. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 2:19 am
Health & Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council and another [2010] EWCA Civ 892; [2010] WLR (D) 224 “A material consideration for a local planning authority when deciding whether to revoke or modify the grant of planning permission under s 97 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 was the authority’s liability to pay compensation under s 107 of the Act. [read post]
