Search for: "Brady v. Brady"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,030
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:12 am
Lee v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:11 pm
The principles of Brady v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, July 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, January 29, 2008 US v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm
The Court concluded that the government had breached its disclosure obligations under Brady v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Title: Placer Dome, Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Miller, No. 06-11078 A conviction for tax evasion is affirmed where: 1) sufficient evidence supported the jury's verdict; 2) there was no abuse of discretion in various evidentiary rulings by the district court; 3) a claim the indictment was duplicitous failed as defendant was not prejudiced; and 4) a Brady claim failed as the cumulative effect of the suppressed evidence at issue did not undermine confidence in the verdict. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Rule 8(b) and Rule 14; and 2) the government violated Brady, when it failed to produce arguably exculpatory evidence with respect to a charged co-conspirator until the week of trial. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:45 pm
In August 2008, barely a year after the Perfect 10 case, the Second Circuit issued in The Cartoon Network LP, LLLP v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 5:23 am
As the Supreme Court noted in Heckler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 1:29 pm
(Shout out to you, Bolling v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Alan also has an interesting take on the Brady v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 2:40 pm
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance] Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Willoughby v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:01 pm
United States (1997), in which the Supreme Court held that the federal government could not require state and local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on gun purchasers as part of the implementation of a federal law (the Brady gun control law). [read post]
