Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 1941 - 1960 of 6,149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2019, 8:49 am by Steven Cohen
Fischer is not qualified to render an opinion in this case because 1) he has never worked for or been retained by a railroad and 2) does not have any case experience with safety vests. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:45 pm by petrocohen
The post How Does New Jersey’s Recent Supplemental Benefit Statute Impact Me? [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 6:29 am by Melinda L. McLellan and Kyle Fath
In particular, Article 1(2) of the ePrivacy Directive states that “the provisions of this Directive particularise and complement Directive 95/46/EC [the “Data Protection Directive]. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:08 pm
(b).)Where a business conditions its offer to remedy a violation of the CLRA on the consumer waiving his or her right to injunctive relief and remedies under other statutes and common law, the offer is not an appropriate correction offer as contemplated by section 1782, subdivision (b), and does not bar a lawsuit by the consumer. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 3:26 am by Sara Parrello
While after this decision we can effectively kiss good bye to disclaimers, the CJEU’s arguments on the “limited value” of descriptive or weak elements does not always appear to find confirmation in practice. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 7:09 am by Paula Urban
” tells the story of a woman named Rachel who experienced an episiotomy during childbirth (1). [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 6:32 am by Kevin Kaufman
(b) Three states levy mandatory, statewide, local add-on sales taxes at the state level: California (1%), Utah (1.25%), and Virginia (1%). [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Yet, the criminal offence of revenge porn as set out in sections 33 – 35 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 does not necessarily cover this content. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 8:22 pm
 54(4)(a) does not apply.[26]        The exception in s. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:09 am by Suzanne A. Luban
Justice Scalia quoted former Ninth Circuit Judge Kozinski’s humorous query in a 2009 dissent: “How does one go about deciding what kind of conduct the ‘ordinary case’ of a crime involves? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Had she had time to make it (she was before a “hot” bench that was not shy about interrupting), her argument might have made five points: 1. [read post]