Search for: "Eugene Volokh"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 8,648
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2012, 7:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Today’s Lilly v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:09 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A commenter writes:If law schools care so much about diversity, then why do they encourage segregated student groups? [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Apilado v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision, handed down yesterday, is Unique Product Solutions, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
(Eugene Volokh) United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Here’s a letter the ACLU of Connecticut wrote on the student’s behalf last week (italics added): We are writing on behalf of Wolcott High School junior Seth Groody and his parents. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:39 am
Eugene Volokh has a great post here about how the law ought to respond to the VT tragedy that picks up a theme I often stress in discussions of the death penalty. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:37 am
(Eugene Volokh) Friday, a new Tennessee law was changed to provide (new material italicized):(a) A person commits an offense who intentionally:(4) Communicates with another person or transmits or displays an image in a manner in which there is a reasonable expectation that the image will be viewed by the victim by [by telephone, in writing or by electronic communication] without legitimate purpose:(A) (i) With the malicious intent to frighten, intimidate or cause emotional… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 5:15 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Reader Jeff Semenak, who lives in Lansing, reports that the Lansing State Journal courthouse notes occasionally mention that someone has been convicted of “seducing an unmarried woman. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:28 am
(Eugene Volokh) The National Post (Canada) reports:After receiving threats and two suspicious letters Tuesday, the National Archives of Canada cancelled the screening of a controversial documentary that critiques Iran’s nuclear weapons program, a move that has organizers questioning the national library’s autonomy.The Free Thinking Film Society’s showing of Iranium prompted so many complaints — some of them from the Iranian Embassy — that staff thought… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:49 am
(Eugene Volokh) I blogged about this case a couple of years ago, and saw that some readers were interested in it; so I thought I’d post an update on it, since it’s coming up to the Court again. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:55 pm
(Eugene Volokh) A unanimous 11-member en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit has just reversed a decision that I blogged about last year, and held that the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act secures a limited right to religious accommodations in court holding cells, and not just in prisons and jails. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
The ensuing Article was published on the Vox Media website The Verge on March 5, 2019, and is entitled, "The Strange Case of Eugene Gu," with the subheading, "Behind one of Twitter's most outspoken social justice personalities is a history of abuse. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:55 am
Eugene Volokh of UCLA has this video for the Federalist Society on proposed ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(g). [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what Sen. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 9:13 pm
By UCLA Magazine.... [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 7:31 am
An excerpt from Eugene Volokh (but read the whole thing): [F]ederalism is rather like individual freedom from government restraint, or government power, or many other concepts. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:50 pm
LawFare: “In 1995, Eugene Volokh published a law review article in which he predicted that the rapidly growing internet would “dramatically reduce the costs of distributing speech” and that “the new media order that these technologies will bring will be much more democratic and diverse than the environment we see now. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 5:00 am
Eugene Volokh has a very good post up today summarizing the Tulane Law Review Scandal. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision is Sarhan v. [read post]
