Search for: "In Matter of Grant"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 54,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2008, 4:14 pm
Justice Koontz talking about brief-writing said one thing the appellee should do is to organize its brief in the same way as the appellant's brief, no matter how inane, so that the brief readers can do a side-by-side analysis of the issues, one by one.He also said think about why the Court granted the petition (which would be great if only they would tell us).He said shorter briefs are better and acknowledged that the Court has been changing the Rules to require shorter… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 9:51 am
The court granted defendant's post-trial motion for judgment as a matter of law that certain method claims were not infringed because one or more steps were performed outside the United States. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 10:48 pm
Super.), ruling that the labels used by defendants Wyeth and Upjohn were adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
2 Jun 2012, 10:47 am
However, in Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly, 25 I & N Dec. 771 (BIA 2012), the Board of Immigration Appeals held that a non-citizen who departs the United States on a grant of advance parole does not trigger the three and ten year bars for purposes of INA §§ 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I), (II). [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 10:43 am
On April 25, 2007, the California Supreme Court granted Singler's petition for review and transferred the matter to this court, with directions to vacate our denial of the petition and to order the Board to show cause why it "did not abuse its discretion and violate due process in finding petitioner unsuitable for parole in June 2006, and why petitioner remains a danger to public safety. [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 12:22 am
Further to the duplicate publication matter involving a paper in Fertility & Sterility of which K.Y. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:00 am
Matter of Collins v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
Today the court granted review in the following cases. [read post]
28 Aug 2006, 12:22 pm
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL) granted the defense motion. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
Ultimately the circuit court concluded that the PSC acted within its authority and on substantial evidence in the record in support of its administrative orders.The court began its analysis by looking at the authority granted to the PSC under the Public Utility Article. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 1:36 pm
Carter, Jr. granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss, with leave for the plaintiff to amend. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 4:53 pm
Sleet recently granted defendant's motion to stay pending reexamination. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 7:02 am
Subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
., the Federal Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment of non-infringement. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:14 pm
Thus, the court reversed the trial court ruling and granted summary judgment in the plaintiffs’ favor on the issue of liability. [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:19 pm
We conclude that the district court possessed subject matter jurisdictionwhen it granted summary judgment, that the court properly followed our most recent mandate, and that the court properly exercised its discretion to deny ArcelorMittal’s Rule 56(d) request. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 12:51 pm
We therefore vacate the court’s grant of summary judgment to RK&K and remand for further proceedings. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:25 pm
He noted that the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York held a status conference in the criminal matter of Khouli, an antiquities trafficking matter, on November 17, 2011. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 11:20 pm
The trial court's October 29, 2010 order granted the motion in part and denied it in part. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
Appellees. 3rd District.Paternity -- Disestablishment -- Trial court erred in granting petition to disestablish paternity on ground that mother failed to produce child for DNA testing without determining whether mother's failure to submit child for testing was willfulDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, o/b/o M.J.W., Appellant, v. [read post]