Search for: "People v Greene" Results 1941 - 1960 of 2,323
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Motors Corp., No. 08-1113ADA - Benefits to former employeeso o SCOTUS docket hereAdam v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:43 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
By Amnesty International’s count, since 2001 over 500 people have died in the US as a result of Taser use. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am by Jeffrey Randa
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2024, 7:26 am by Stephen E. Sachs
And from the introduction: Contracts students may remember the old chestnut of Cotnam v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 12:57 pm
Yesterday, as I looked for images of water pistols to use in the teaching of a patent law case (Larami v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
There are carveouts for dual U.S. citizens and green card holders, but other lawfully present Chinese nationals face further restrictions. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:35 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
A permanent Portuguese fort was established at Arguin in 1448, and the 1452 Dum Diversas papal bull of Pope Nicholas V specifically authorized Alfonso V of Portugal, …full and free permission to invade, search out, capture, and subjugate the Saracens and pagans and any other unbelievers and enemies of Christ wherever they may be… and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery. [read post]