Search for: "Sharpe v. State"
Results 1941 - 1960
of 2,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2015, 2:38 pm
Further, Plaintiff stated that there were no glow-in-the-dark strips on the edge of the platform and there were no lights running along the side of the seats in the Theater. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 11:17 am
The case, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) v. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
In the first Nokia v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 5:02 am
The most famous example, I think, is Chicago v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:04 am
Aside from the inevitable coarseness of the filters, if this is nudging it is nudging with sharp elbows. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 8:44 am
The district court’s order granting summary judgment in Carnes v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:38 am
Indeed, the government argues that Congress should be assumed to have adopted the "rule" the Court announced in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:00 am
Repressive efforts by states such as anti-homosexual propaganda laws and criminalization of information on contraception ironically succeed in producing the homosexual and the autonomous woman. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 8:42 am
Robart, the federal judge presiding over the Microsoft v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
An appellate court decision issued last week in Lehey v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:30 pm
A more significant free speech victory for Big Pharma was delivered by the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:00 am
The sharp debate over its passage reflected clashing institutional priorities. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
All of these decisions were sharply divided and warrant sharp criticism. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:27 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:48 pm
Sharp Corporation, et. al (Docket Report) Stays pending patent reexamination: Sweetening the deal: TDY Industries v Ingersoll Cutting Tool Co (Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court E D California: False marking complaint alleging defendant had ‘no reasonable basis to believe’ its products were patented sufficiently pled intent to deceive: Hallstrom v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Consider the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
