Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 1941 - 1960 of 7,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2019, 8:08 am by Lauren E. Quigley
  The Second Circuit held that the non-bank loan holder was not entitled to the preemptive protection of the National Bank Act, which allows nationally chartered banks to export the interest rates of their home state without being subject to the usury limits of any other state in which the bank makes loans. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 4:06 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
  The Court stated that “[d]ue diligence did not require defendant to raise any claims against plaintiff in its counterclaims against the other lien holders, which concerned only the priority of competing liens. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:15 pm
  To give a majority of the existing holders security in their ownership of the corporation, and to expressly prevent its dilution.All that's undercut -- egregiously -- by the Court of Appeal's holding. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:09 am by Anna Christensen
Continuing the coverage of Tuesday’s oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
  Patten LJ (who gave the lead judgment) stated that where a company makes a claim for losses suffered by it as a result of the conduct of a fraudulent director, it does not matter if the company was the intended primary or secondary victim of the fraud. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports… [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:06 pm by Oyez Project
Holder No. 10-553: Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]