Search for: "D. T. S. v. B. E. C." Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,325
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 8:00 pm by Julio César Córdoba
Feldstein de Cárdenas y Luciana B. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 4:05 am by SHG
While some, if not many, would argue that the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Elicier Díaz, 183 DPR 167 (2011), que la identidad de un agente encubierto en funciones constituye, de por sí, un interés apremiante del Estado que merece y obliga la protección por parte de los Tribunales. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 6:14 pm
(c) Discharge, formally discipline, or otherwise discriminate against an employee who discloses information about the employer's working conditions. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The Second Restatement conditions negligence per se liability on violation of an enactment that met four "purposes":(a) to protect a class of persons which includes the onewhose interest is invaded, and(b) to protect the particular interest which is invaded, and(c) to protect that interest against the kind of harm which has resulted, and(d) to protect that interest against the particular hazardfrom which the harm results.Restatement (Second) of Torts §286… [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 9:48 am by Susan Brenner
(I omitted the substance of the chats (a) because I’m sure you can imagine what they said and (b) because they’d made this post way, way too long if I included them.) [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:07 am by sevach
En el supuesto de tratarse de una entidad financiera no residente en España se hará constar su razón social así como los dígitos del Código IBAN correspondientes a la entidad bancaria. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:44 am by Kevin
Maybe it was tiny print, but it seems more likely that the judge was r e a d i n g  v e r y  s l o w l y, making this even more painful that it would otherwise have been. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 12:20 am by JR Chaves
La Directiva europea aplicable al caso deja fuera el problema de si se consume o no tabaco, pues se aplica expresamente a otros productos si se aplica la técnica de fumar (“Se asimilarán a los cigarrillos y al tabaco para fumar los productos constituidos exclusiva o parcialmente por sustancias distintas del tabaco pero que respondan a los demás criterios…”). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 12:58 pm by Susan Brenner
Thus, Stanton's actions do not fall within the scope of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of [Georgia Code § 16-9-93]. [read post]