Search for: "GRAVES v. STATE"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 2,427
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 10:16 pm
(See our link to the Court’s opinion in Saltonstall v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:08 am
For example, the DC Circuit court last week decided Rasul v Myers in which the court, finding that the claimant could not succeed in a damages claim against the government, held:The present case involves the method of detaining and interrogating alleged enemy combatants during a war -- a matter with grave national security implications. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
While our cases prohibiting viewpoint discrimination would fetter the state's power to some degree, see R.A.V. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:29 am
”John Thorpe MP put the State firmly ahead of the individual:“… In my view the State is in great danger, and no power which would tend to protect it should be withheld from the Government. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:00 pm
Véase, In re State ex rel. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
In the middle are a small group of academic theorists who see value and resilience in the state but understand that the ideological pretensions of the Westphalian system have become unrealistic in a world now ordered through governance frameworks of a number of actors only some of which are states. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
Everybody knows that you can’t put a cross on a Jewish soldier’s grave. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 7:41 pm
All this had a grave impact on people's thinking and the public opinion environment. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Third-party defendant and second-third party defendant Heatley also moves, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party and second third-party actions against it in accordance with Section 23 of the Massachusetts Workers' Compensation Law which bars all third-party actions against the employer in common law; or, in the alternative, in the absence of a finding of "grave injury," in accordance with Section 11 of the New York Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 1:51 pm
Third-party defendant and second-third party defendant Heatley also moves, for summary judgment dismissing the third-party and second third-party actions against it in accordance with Section 23 of the Massachusetts Workers' Compensation Law which bars all third-party actions against the employer in common law; or, in the alternative, in the absence of a finding of "grave injury," in accordance with Section 11 of the New York Workers' Compensation Law. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 2:48 pm
(iv) and (v) are functions of the forward movement and cease—indeed (v) is reversed—as soon as the position fails to improve further. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 2:22 pm
In that case, Drury v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:00 pm
The new appeal is Gates v. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:14 pm
IndiaRout v. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 7:47 am
That state of affairs is a pity but suggests the Gordian knot both states have now worked furiously to create and preserve remains undisturbed. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:33 am
Contra, EEOC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 4:44 pm
In other news New South Wales may become the first state to institute laws for invasions of privacy, after the State Parliament’s law and justice committee recommended that NSW should “lead the way” in Australia with laws of this type. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
Afr. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 12:04 am
State of Haryana and another [(2003) 4 SCC 675], Nikhil Merchant v. [read post]
