Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 19,653
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2024, 9:29 pm
In What Ways Does Nebraska’s Consumer Data Privacy Law Matter to Your Business? [read post]
14 May 2007, 12:01 am
None of this means that special interests don't matter, but it does put their activities in a new light. [read post]
6 May 2008, 2:43 pm
But matters look much less agreeable when the same asset values are falling. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:12 am
The question is, where does this leave our State and the Nation. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
On claimants' appeal, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board issued five substantially identical decisions adopting the ALJ's finding and opinions. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
On claimants' appeal, the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board issued five substantially identical decisions adopting the ALJ's finding and opinions. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 8:46 am
Just what does the FCC now require that a licensee file? [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:05 pm
Perhaps that explains why FoA was opposing the “Go Vegan” approach that I urged HSUS to adopt. [read post]
12 May 2022, 3:30 am
To make matters worse, some of those reports accused the company of hiding this allegedly apocalyptic disclosure. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 5:04 am
” It requires each district to adopt anti-bullying and anti-harassment policies. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:14 pm
When the government (federal, state, and local) spends over 1/3 of the gross domestic product, and when tax exemptions are broadly available to a vast range of charitable organizations, it would be wrong, I think, to deny this same exemption to religious institutions that take a different approach to sex relations than does the government (assuming the government indeed adopts the rigid view that the professor suggests). [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 1:03 pm
The Court held, contrary to the arguments advanced by the municipalities, that section 316.008(1)(w)’s grant of authority for “regulating, restricting, or monitoring traffic by security devices” does not explicitly provide authority for local governments to adopt measures for the punishment of conduct that is already subject to punishment under Chapters 316 and 318. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
LexisNexis Risk Solutions does not represent nor warrant that this document is complete or error free. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:15 am
This provision encompasses a broad range of liability types, all based on a 'harmful event' that has a caused a damage to the claimant.This would be the case of compensation for private copying: failure to pay the compensation due to rightholders would cause a damage to the relevant rightholder and be "an absolutely quintessential instance of a matter relating to tort or delict" (para 75).The AG noted that, while it is true that the marketing of mobile telephones… [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 7:49 am
Does that have greater merit? [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:59 am
” The court adopted the Barnett conflict preemption standard. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:02 am
On the other hand, asserting copyright for model rules is a more complicated and difficult matter, because the very act of promulgating "model" enactments seems to presuppose that you want others to copy, use, adopt, and adapt your work product and because once any state enacts the rule, then the model and the law merge, and you can't assert a copyright over law. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 12:23 am
The examiner in the BlackBoard matter also cited KSR on the "combination of familiar elements. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:44 pm
Constitution: Interpretation and Enforcement:" "The Supreme Court has occasionally ruled on origination clause matters, adopting a definition of revenue bills that is based on two central principles that tend to narrow its application to fewer classes of legislation than the House: (1) raising money must be the primary purpose of the measure, rather than an incidental effect; and (2) the resulting funds must be for the expenses or obligations of the government generally,… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 6:02 pm
While declining to adopt a "bright-line rule" precluding the exercise of subject matter jurisdiction over such claims, the Second Circuit held that, in general, a U.S. court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over foreign-cubed claims when the acts that constituted the alleged fraud and directly caused the alleged harm emanated from outside the United States. [read post]
