Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 1961 - 1980
of 14,924
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2016, 7:30 am
Not one was accused of committing a crime, but it didn’t matter. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 2:27 am
Nice line - "Four more years we can't afford. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 2:33 am
Today marks the second day of my 12 Days of Charitable Giving. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 4:56 pm
I predict that the plaintiff's lawyer Mark Arisohn won't be getting much sleep tonight.Judge Ungaro Throws Out Bank Atlantic Verdict(function() { var scribd = document.createElement("script"); scribd.type = "text/javascript"; scribd.async = true; scribd.src = "http://www.scribd.com/javascripts/embed_code/inject.js"; var s = document.getElementsByTagName("script")[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(scribd, s); })(); [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
At the core of the brief is the argument that metadata matters. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:21 am
Elsewhere, the jiplp weblog carries a Current Intelligence note from Mira T. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Introduction by Nomi Maya Stolzenberg and Douglas NeJaime; articles by Mark Tushnet, Ira C. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 8:06 pm
Courts exclude this evidence because we don’t want juries to take subsequent remedial measures as proof of guilt. [read post]
21 May 2024, 11:45 am
[t]herefore, we find confusion unlikely” therein failing to establish priority. [read post]
20 May 2011, 6:37 am
For example, I realized that Mark Lemley's Rational Ignorance at the Patent Office has 368 citations—more than any on this list—but it doesn't show up when you search the JLR database for "patent," even though it has "patent" in the title. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 5:43 am
To quote Mark, "You will be astonished midway through. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 11:21 am
Rev. 671 ) has as footnote 4: See Mark A. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 1:21 pm
” Defendants argued that “truthful disclaimers and explanations on the Website cannot be disregarded because of their placement or font size,” so whether they were conspicuous or not didn’t matter. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Finally, and perhaps most damningly, the examining attorney issued an advisory suggesting that the mark — or what’s left of it once an amended drawing is provided — may consist of unregistrable, functional matter (which we cover in spades on this blog). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
example, the Trademark Office refused registration on the grounds that the applied-for mark “consists or includes matter which may falsely suggest a connection with the actor Charlie Sheen. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 3:22 am
I guess such is the case in the world of social media where current events can be discussed ad nauseam in a matter of minutes. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm
Yeah1 Mark Lanier’s Deceptive Cartoon Advocacy A recent book by Kurt Andersen details the extent of American fantasy, in matters religious, political, and scientific.2 Andersen’s book is a good read and a broad-ranging dissection of the American psyche for cadswallop. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 10:25 am
And how you define “god”, for that matter. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:43 am
The main purpose of the priority claim (at least in trade mark matters) is to provide the applicant with a “period of reflection to decide whether he wants also to submit an application for registration of a European Union trade mark for that mark and for goods and services identical to those in respect of which that mark is filed or contained within the latter” (General Court, T-82/14). [read post]
25 Jan 2020, 3:42 am
Ziv gives the excuse for why, no matter what the case, it proves guilt. [read post]
