Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 37,174
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2016, 10:22 am
But because the Constitution gives Congress authority to govern non-state territories, the Supreme Court’s century-old decision in Grafton v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 7:20 am
The summary judgment hearing in Tafas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:02 pm
That’s the Supreme Court in Zorach v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:48 pm
Other than the minor surprise I now experience when any motion to compel arbitration is denied, such agreements having achieved a status as super-contracts with super powers, the decision in Nunez v. [read post]
7 Aug 2022, 5:48 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm
Its luxury-goods business model and its abuse of market power against suppliers and app developers are wildly profitable. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Vasquez offers insights into her experiences during the Depp v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Since assuming his new role, the number of states requesting an Article V convention has stagnated. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s June ruling in Moore v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
An early Supreme Court decision in Chisholm v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 4:25 am
In State of Texas v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:05 am
The brief complaint (full text) in People of the United States of America and the State of California v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:51 am
If King v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:06 am
See Chavarria v. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 7:49 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:13 am
In United States v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division noted that the judiciary “had no power to negotiate with the State with respect to the decrease in compensation,” and they “received no benefit from the no-layoffs promise because their terms of office were either statutorily or constitutionally mandated. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
Schwartz, The Spirit of the Constitution: John Marshall and the 200-Year Odyssey of McCulloch v. [read post]