Search for: "State v. Chance"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 12,113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
So those entering the Courtroom today have a pretty good chance of hearing something significant. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 9:31 am
John Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
More secret justice on the horizon Secret evidence v open justice: the current state of play More secret trials? [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 5:22 pm
The other state is given a chance to respond to the motion to file. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:12 am
At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen weighs in on employment-discrimination case Fort Bend County v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 7:04 am
New York City, 08-969), and a state legislature’s power to bar federal courts from ruling on class action cases that are based on state law claims (Shady Grove Orthopedic Association v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 4:00 am
Fujie is President of the State Bar of California and a Shareholder in her firm’s Insurance Industry and Litigation Practice Groups in Los Angeles, where she focuses on complex litigation, with an emphasis on insurance and surety industry related litigation. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. ___________________________________________________________________________ The Bronx Household of Faith v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:36 pm
But rules are rules.It's a continuing debate: Fairness v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:08 am
In state court, in the state of Washington (Spokane). [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 11:11 am
Van Hook (09-144) United States Defense Department v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
These are petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues Title: Maxwell-Jolly v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 8:28 am
Unwilling to give the state another chance to prove that the Dixon rule is adequate, the court remanded for consideration of the merits of the petitioner's claims.Congratulations to Deputy [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:32 am
In Graham v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
In the South Carolina gambling case, Jimmy Martin and Luck Strike LLC sued state officials to stop them from enforcing two state statutes that criminalize certain "device[s] pertaining to games of chance. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:46 pm
Holder; Mendiola v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:42 pm
All of that bigly boosts the plaintiff’s chances of success. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 12:53 pm
A federal court of appeals declined to extend the long-standing consent decree in litigation known as DNC v. [read post]
