Search for: "State v. Means" Results 1961 - 1980 of 61,243
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2023, 12:05 am by Paul Caron
United States Arizona State Responds To... [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:41 am
Here is the answer from Wikipedia: 2008, United States Supreme Court oral argument, United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 11:40 am
In 2003, the Supreme Court declared state laws against consensual sodomy by same-sex couples to be unconstitutional, in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Jon
There is also guidance from the way the Constitution was ratified: By conventions in each state, elected by the people, but composed of a high proportion of lawyers, who also dominated the debates. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 3:09 am by Matrix Legal  Information Team
However, DP5/96, being an amply flexible statement that a rule may be relaxed depending on all the circumstances of the case, is not a rule within the meaning of s 3(2) of the 1971 Act and the Secretary of State did not have to lay it before Parliament. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied petitioner's application upon the ground that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied petitioner's application upon the ground that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied petitioner's application upon the ground that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied petitioner's application upon the ground that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied petitioner's application upon the ground that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363. [read post]