Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Scales" Results 1961 - 1980 of 2,797
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case  Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:46 am by Eugene Volokh
Having one party incognito but not the other can tilt the scales of justice in the direction of guilt by anonymous accusation, a prospect which would be just as abhorrent to civil litigation as it is to our criminal justice system. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer’s legal and management consulting work throughout her 27 plus year career has focused on helping organizations and their management use the law and process to manage people, process, compliance, operations and risk. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 1:41 am
In conclusion, Jacoby discussed tarnishment, in the form of Anheuser-Busch v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 The requirement of a large scale color graphic was “simply unprecedented. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Now is the time for people to remember to live within their means. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
Nonetheless, the Court specifically affirmed the use of a punitive damage awards as a sanction and significantly raised the bar as to the amount of punitive damages that may appropriately be awarded in such cases: The punitive damage award in this case is on the same scale as awards in Whiten [$1 million] and Hill v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
Second, is the justice the “swing justice” who tips the scales in the most important 5-4 cases? [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am by Richard Altieri, Margaret Taylor
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:45 am by Schachtman
And even if they were to allow such a cognitive maneuver, most people, and even judges, cannot map practical certainty, or something like “beyond a reaonable doubt” on to a probability scale of 0 to 1. [read post]