Search for: "United States v. George" Results 1961 - 1980 of 3,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2008, 5:28 pm
Constitution: "I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of the President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), retired state-court judge George Eskin urges the justices to review Lacaze v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 9:43 am by Kyle Persaud
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution says, “This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Had one looked at this issue in 1921, the United States would have had company: At that time, Australia and Canada, countries that, like the United States, were influenced by the British tradition, provided judges with indefinite tenure during good behavior.[3]However, each of these countries amended their constitutions and adopted mandatory retirement ages for their federal judges later in the 20thcentury – 70 in Australia, 75 in Canada. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 5:35 am by Nick Basciano
United States, John posted the comments of Edwin Williamson, former Department of State Legal Adviser in the George H.W. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:30 am by Jordan Brunner
Harward, who speaks Farsi and grew up in Iran, served on the National Security Council during the George W. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 7:28 pm by Ryan
Wrotnowski was a challenge to Barack Obama’s qualifications to serve as President of the United States. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act is unconstitutionally vague, “is a huge deal in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm
Also in June last year, the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously approved a parallel project “[r]equest[ing] the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to continue the work on domestic law remedies to address corporate involvement in gross human rights abuses, and to organize consultations with experts, States and other relevant stakeholders”. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:53 am by Kevin LaCroix
”  Brief for Chamber of Commerce of the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioners, Dura Pharm., Inc. v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Constitution - United States [read post]