Search for: "United States v. Lively"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 11,366
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2016, 9:33 am
By the time they have symptoms and go to the doctor, they are often told they do not have long to live, since the cancer is in such an advanced state. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 6:43 am
Worcester v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
The state contends that Longoni was relying only on Rast’s notes; Smith contended that he relied on Rast’s report as well as on her notes, and treated them essentially as a unit. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 pm
The Appellant’s brief in support of its Motion for Rehearing or Certification to the Supreme Court in the decision of the United States Fifth District Court of Appeals, in Marion v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:18 am
The boy lived with OYPC in the United States and was enrolled in the local high school, where he was a student when his sister, OYPC, filed an application seeking custody of him. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 9:52 am
According to an account in the New York Times, the case - Flores-Villar v United States - concerns a father seeking to pass his US citizenship on to his foreign-born son. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:30 am
Yet, we’ve got 3.2 million people in the United States living in extreme poverty. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
If the United States walks away, it will put Ukraineat risk. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:16 pm
He added that one way to ensure that only the guilty are convicted is to uphold the promise of Gideon v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
Moreno v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
Circuit Court of Appeals rejected that reasoning in United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am
Purdue's relentless promotion of OxyContin itself caused tens of thousands of deaths, ruined many more lives, and played a key role in fueling the wider opioid epidemic that still bedevils individuals, families, and communities throughout the United States.After years of inaction, the United States brought civil and criminal charges against Purdue the company (but not the Sacklers), resulting in a guilty plea and a $2 billion forfeiture, but meanwhile, the… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:24 am
Our live-blog coverage of the orders is available here; the full order list is here. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:20 pm
(2015).Citing the 14th Amendment, the ruling reversed the decision of the lower court, the United States Court of Appeal for the Sixth Circuit, which had ruled, “[a] state had no constitutional obligation to license same-sex marriages or to recognize same-sex marriages performed out of state. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2024, 7:27 pm
Understanding the issues in Mexico v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:56 pm
The facts of the case are fairly straightforward:Petitioner Jose Ernesto Medellin, a Mexican national, has lived in the United States since preschool. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
As Election Day turns into Election Night, do you worry about a similar scenario playing out in the United States? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
In R (on the application of Naik) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2011] EWCA Civ 1546) the Court of Appeal confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
