Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 1961 - 1980
of 9,490
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2007, 11:02 pm
Name data are from Social Security card applications for births that occurred in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 6:35 pm
This clause states, in part, “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 8:54 pm
United Industrial Bank, Ashok Kumar Lingala v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
Images from Opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.On June 8, 2023, the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of Jack Daniels in the case of Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:04 am
Steele v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
Motorola, Inc. and TCL v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
" United States Soccer Federation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
In a rare, contested concurrent use proceeding, the Board awarded junior user ABF concurrent use registrations for the three marks shown below, for hotel and motel services, in the entire United States except for the State of Arizona. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 10:39 am
| Feilin v. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 6:08 am
Mark L. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:27 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a recent decision from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:11 am
Facts: This case (Zavislak v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:18 am
On August 5, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the TTAB’s decision to cancel a trademark registration for the mark HOLLYWOOD BEER as a discovery sanction for the registrant’s repeated, frivolous filings and failure to comply with discovery orders. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
United States, the case of a Pennsylvania woman who attempted to poison her husband’s paramour. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 1:46 pm
On May 25, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) made its final decision on a long-running case that will redefine the power and authority that the United States Environmental Protection agency (EPA) will have to regulate and protect the navigable waters of the United States (WOTUS). [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
However, last week’s High Court, England and Wales, ruling in Enterprise v Europcar [2015] EWHC 300 (Ch) shows this is by no means a settled area, explains katfriend Jeremy Blum(Bristows LLP).* The Richemont ruling and beyond: dealing with counterfeit websites and the intermediaries that host themKatfriend Tim Behean provides another insightful analysis of Cartier International AG and Others v British Sky Broadcasting Ltd and Others [2014] EWHC 3354… [read post]
