Search for: ""Atkins v. Virginia" OR "536 U.S. 304""
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 316, n.21 (2002); Roper v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:16 am
Citing Martin v. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:14 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), and Hall v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 6:59 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) (ruling that the Eighth Amendment precludes the execution of the intellectually disabled) and its progeny. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 3:00 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304, 122 S. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm
Florida, 134 S.Ct. 1986 (2014) and Atkins v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 9:49 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), and remanded with instructions to grant the writ and order the state courts to resentence the petitioner to something other than death.The petitioner was convicted of sexual assault and first-degree murder in 1982, and filed his federal habeas petition in 1987, before the effective date of AEDPA. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002); capital punishment for defendants under 18, Roper v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 3:08 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002); capital punishment for defendants under 18, Roper v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:20 pm
In Atkins v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
After the Supreme Court decided Atkins v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 11:59 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) that execution of the mentally disabled violates the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), the Court prohibited the imposition of the death penalty on mentally retarded defendants. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:43 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), the Court prohibited the imposition of the death penalty on mentally retarded defendants. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 10:55 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002) when the court held that executions of mentally disabled criminals are ‘cruel and unusual punishments’ prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:07 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002). [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:00 am
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002)), and that issue has been litigated extensively in the military appellate courts in this case. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:52 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), have emphasized two considerations: First, a categorical approach is utilized to limit juror discretion that creates an intolerably high risk of an unwarranted death sentence. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 2:44 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), have emphasized two considerations: First, a categorical approach is utilized to limit juror discretion that creates an intolerably high risk of an unwarranted death sentence. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:40 pm
Virginia, 536 U.S. 304 (2002), have emphasized two considerations: First, a categorical approach is utilized to limit juror discretion that creates an intolerably high risk of an unwarranted death sentence. [read post]
