Search for: ""Auffmordt v. Hedden" OR "137 U.S. 310""
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2011, 1:36 pm
Hedden, 137 U.S. 310, 327 (1890)).]For the reasons discussed, supra, the qui tam provision of the False Marking Statute, 35 U.S.C. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Hedden, 137 U.S. 310 (1890), where an importer challenged the appointment of an expert merchant appraiser on the grounds that the appraiser should have been appointed as an Officer. [read post]
