Search for: ""Burford v. Sun Oil Co." OR "319 U.S. 315"" Results 1 - 12 of 12
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2007, 8:15 am
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943), to let the parties sort out the issues in state court. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 7:32 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) abstention might apply, but that isn't clear, either. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:51 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 63 S. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 5:03 am by Jon Gelman
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) (The Burford Doctrine) in dismissing the Federal claim. [read post]
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 (1943) because “Pennsylvania should be allowed to continue the development of acceptable insurance claim procedures consistent with its law and not have unacceptable practices continue within Pennsylvania by development of inconsistent precedent outside Pennsylvania’s own system. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315, 332-34, 63 S.Ct. 1098, 1106-07 (1943), on the grounds that judicial dissolution of corporations is a matter uniquely to be addressed by the New York state courts. [read post]