Search for: ""Diamond v. Charles" OR "476 U.S. 54""
Results 1 - 6
of 6
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2010, 1:48 pm
Charles, 476 U.S. 54 (1986) for the proposition that : “Where private persons have intervened in a lawsuit to defend a state law, and the trial court has ruled for the plaintiff, the intervenors cannot by themselves prolong the litigation through an appeal unless the intervenors independently establish their Article III standing. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:54 am
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 62. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:10 am
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 62 (1986) They further note that, under Diamond, state law may “create new interests, the invasion of which may confer standing. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 69, 106 S.Ct. 1697, 90 L.Ed.2d 48 (1986). [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Charles, 476 U.S. 54, 64 (1986). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
